The effect of initial damage induced by stress on the time-dependent behaviour of Beishan granite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To understand the time-dependent fracture behaviour of hard rock in the excavation damage zone, a series of stress paths are designed to obtain the same initial damage extent induced by excavation. The influence of initial damage under different stress states on the creep process of Beishan granite is investigated experimentally. A unified indicator, i.e., the time-dependent fracture potential index ( ξTFPI), is proposed to conveniently describe the effect of applied stress on the creep process. The results show that the time-dependent strain increases with increasing initial damage extent and is significantly affected by the applied stress at a given initial damage extent. Under the same initial damage extent, with the increase in ξTFPI, the larger the primary creep strain rate and secondary creep strain rate are, and this phenomenon is more obvious in the lateral creep results. The secondary creep strain rate increases with increasing ξTFPI, and the increasing trend of the axial secondary creep strain rate with ξTFPI is greater with a higher initial damage. Finally, a quantitative relationship of the secondary creep strain rate with the initial damage and ξTFPI is established and validated against the experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".