Axial response of resin-encapsulated cable bolts in monotonic and cyclic loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ease of use and the design flexibility of cable bolts have made them a popular choice for rock support. Cable bolts can be encapsulated with cementitious grout or resin. There is a need to better understand the impact of resins on the behaviour of cable bolts under varying load and stress regimes over their long service life. This study reports on 18 large-scale resin pull-out tests. The testing apparatus minimised the rotational movement of the cable at the exit point by using a fully grouted anchor tube. Six cable bolts, ranging from 50 to 100 tonnes in capacity, anchored using a fast-curing urea silica resin, were tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. Each cable type was tested twice in monotonic loading, and then the average initial peak load was used to generate a cyclic loading pattern. The study found that the resin product had a relatively low load capacity regardless of the cable type, and that loading type had a minimal impact on the results. The cable diameter had a minor influence on the pull-out results. The resin provided a stiff behaviour and an excellent response to repeated loading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".