A novel clean bio-pulping process for rice straw based on aerobic fermentation coupled with mechanical refining
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the effect of aerobic fermentation pretreatment on bio-mechanical pulping of rice straw was investigated with compound bacterial agents (2 geobacillus sp, 1 parageobacillus sp and 4 thermos sp). The microbial community, chemical composition, surface morphology, crystal index and other parameters were monitored at various time intervals during the aerobic fermentation process. The chemical constituents of rice straw (mainly cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) were partly degraded and dissolved in the fermentation process, leading to increased surface roughness and crystallinity index. The bio-mechanical pulping process was optimized in terms of Canadian freeness standard (CSF), specific energy consumption (SEC), water retention value (WRV), pulping yield, and physical properties of the resultant pulp. Under the optimal process conditions, the fermentation pre-treatment resulted in about 54% energy saving, 13% WRV improvement, and 81% increase in tensile strength at a given pulp freeness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".