Common population characteristics of direct‐seeded hybrid <i>indica</i> rice for high yield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Direct seeding of rice has attracted attention because of its simplicity and rapidity compared with traditional cultivation methods. However, the geographical location of the rice region in Southwest China is complex, and the common characteristics of high yield of direct seeding hybrid indica rice and the law of nutrient absorption and accumulation are still unclear. This study results demonstrated that the mean yield of high‐yield varieties (HYV) in the two ecological points increased by 17.68%–19.98% and 17.37%–27.06%, respectively, compared with low‐yield varieties (LYV). The high tillering ability and effective tillering rate of HYV promoted a large leaf area index (LAI) and a strong photosynthetic capacity and stimulated the accumulation of aboveground biomass and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrients in rice plants, which were finally transported and allocated to the grains to maintain high yields. Correlation analysis indicated that yield and its components were closely related to spatial population structure and nutrient accumulation and allocation. In particular, LAI at the full heading stage, net photosynthetic rate, aboveground biomass from jointing to maturity stage, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium accumulation and distribution from jointing to full heading stage have the strongest correlation with yield and its components. Therefore, improving the effective tillering rate and LAI, as well as the accumulation and distribution of aboveground biomass, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium of rice plants from jointing to full heading stage, are the common laws for the formation of high yield of direct seeding hybrid rice in different ecological areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".