MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract CT174: First-in-class anti-CD200R1 antibody 23ME-00610 in patients with advanced solid malignancies: Phase 1 results

2023· article· en· W4365512242 on OpenAlexaff
Shivaani Kummar, Albiruni Abdul Razak, Scott A. Laurie, Sariah Kell, Dylan M. Glatt, Sophia R. Majeed, Drew Rasco

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityDiscontinuationPharmacodynamicsCancerOncologyInternal medicinePharmacokineticsImmunotherapyAntibodyAdverse effectPharmacologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: CD200R1 was identified as a promising immuno-oncology (IO) target from the 23andMe database. Pleiotropic causal variants with opposing effect on risks for cancer and immune diseases, referred to as an IO signature, were observed in 3 components of the CD200R1 pathway. 23ME-00610 is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that potently inhibits the CD200R1 immune checkpoint (KD less than 0.1 nM). The dose escalation portion of the first-in-human, Phase 1/2a study of 23ME-00610 (NCT05199272) has been completed and we are reporting data for the first time. Methods: Eligible patients were alteast 18 years with histologically diagnosed locally advanced (unresectable), or metastatic carcinoma or sarcoma who have progressed on standard therapies with ECOG 0 or 1. Key exclusion criteria included active autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppressive therapy and Grade 3 or above immune-mediated toxicity related to prior immunotherapy that led to discontinuation. Dose escalation consisted of accelerated titration (2 and 6 mg) followed by a 3+3 design (20, 60, 200, 600 and 1400 mg). Up to 12 participants were included in a PKPD backfill cohort at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) or a previously evaluated dose level. Participants received 23ME-00610 intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) infused over 30 minutes. The primary objectives of Phase 1 were determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and tolerability. Key secondary and exploratory objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and antitumor activity of 23ME-00610. Results: Between January 5th, 2022 and November 28, 2022, 21 participants (11/10 male/female; age range: 21-80 years) were enrolled and received ≥ 1 dose of 23ME-00610 across the 2 to 1400 mg cohorts (median duration of exposure: 50 days; range:1-231 days). No dose limiting toxicities, treatment related serious adverse events (TRSAEs) or AEs leading to discontinuation were observed. 14/21 (67%) participants experienced atleast 1 TRAE; the majority were Grade 1 or 2. The most commonly reported TRAEs occurring in atleast 2 participants across all dose levels were headache, fatigue, nausea and pruritis. There was 1 Grade 3 TRAE of increased blood creatinine phosphokinase. Investigator-assessed immune-related AEs including hypothyroidism, pruritis, fatigue and chills were observed at doses 60 mg and above. The PK of 23ME-00610 were dose-proportional at doses 60 mg and above, with a median terminal half-life of ~12 days at 1400 mg. Peripheral saturation of CD200R1 was observed at doses 60 mg and above, as measured by receptor occupancy on T cells and neutrophils, and levels of free soluble CD200R1. Analysis of additional PD data, including cytokines, is ongoing. Conclusion: 23ME-00610 demonstrated an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, with favorable PK and peripheral CD200R1 saturation. Increased immune-related AEs were observed at higher, pharmacologically relevant dose levels. Based on Phase 1 data, 1400 mg 23ME-00610 Q3W will be evaluated in Phase 2a. Citation Format: Shivaani Kummar, Albiruni ABDUL RAZAK, Scott Laurie, Sariah Kell, Dylan Glatt, Sophia R. Majeed, Drew Rasco. First-in-class anti-CD200R1 antibody 23ME-00610 in patients with advanced solid malignancies: Phase 1 results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT174.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→