Abstract CT029: Phase Ib study of GDC-6036 in combination with cetuximab in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with <i>KRAS G12C</i> mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: GDC-6036 is an oral, highly potent and selective KRAS G12C inhibitor that demonstrated anti-tumor activity in patients with KRAS G12C-positive advanced solid tumors, including CRC. In a previously reported single-agent cohort, GDC-6036 achieved a best response of partial response or complete response in 35% (19/55) of patients, with a confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 24% (13/55 patients) in KRAS G12C-positive CRC patients (Desai et. al., ESMO 2022). EGFR blockade may sensitize tumors to KRAS G12C inhibition and the combination of an anti-EGFR antibody (cetuximab) with a KRAS G12C inhibitor showed greater anti-tumor activity than single-agent KRAS G12C inhibition in preclinical models (Amodio et. al., 2020). Methods: In an ongoing Phase I study (NCT04449874), patients with advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C-positive CRC were administered GDC-6036 (200-400 mg orally once a day) with cetuximab (400 mg/m2 intravenously initially, then 250 mg/m2 weekly) until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. Endpoints included safety (NCI-CTCAE v5), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary anti-tumor activity (RECIST v1.1). Results: As of the clinical data cut-off date of 21 Nov 2022, 29 patients (enrolled by 07 Oct 2022) had received GDC-6036 and cetuximab. The median lines of prior metastatic therapy was 2 (range 1-8) and the median time on study treatment was 5.2 (range 1.4-11.2) months. All patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE); the most common TRAEs (≥15%) were rash (grouped terms), diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, dry skin, and paronychia. Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 11 patients (38%). Five patients (17%) experienced at least one serious AE, none of which were treatment-related (including 2 patients who died of CRC progression during the safety follow-up). AEs led to GDC-6036 modifications (interruptions and/or reductions) in 13 (45%) patients, dose reduction in 3 (10%) patients, and no patients discontinued due to AEs. Eleven patients discontinued from study treatment (10 due to disease progression and 1 due to physician’s discretion). The PK profile of GDC-6036 (400 mg once a day) was similar in combination with cetuximab when compared with single-agent. A partial response was achieved in 66% (19/29) of patients, with a confirmed ORR of 62% (18/29 patients). Conclusions: GDC-6036 in combination with cetuximab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising clinical activity. These data support that the addition of anti-EGFR therapy to GDC-6036 may lead to robust clinical benefit in patients with KRAS G12C-positive CRC. Citation Format: Jayesh Desai, Sae-Won Han, Jong-Seok Lee, Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Erminia Massarelli, Andrés Cervantes, Elena Garralda, Alejandro Falcon, Wilson H. Miller, Eelke Gort, Thomas Karasic, Salvatore Siena, Rafal Stec, Laura Medina, Luis Paz-Arez, Angelo Delmonte, Adrian Sacher, Hans Prenen, Martin Forster, Tae Won Kim, Matthew G. Krebs, Rasha Cosman, Yoonha Choi, Sandhya Mandlekar, Mark T. Lin, Kenneth K. Yau, Julie Chang, Stephanie Royer-Joo, Neekesh V. Dharia, Jennifer L. Schutzman, Manish Patel. Phase Ib study of GDC-6036 in combination with cetuximab in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with KRAS G12C mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT029.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".