The Influence of Family Factors on College Students' Self-esteem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Self-esteem, generally refers to an evaluation made and usually held by individuals, which is one of the important factors affecting individual mental health. Nowadays, society pays more and more attention to college students' mental health. As an important index, self-esteem is of great significance to promote college students' psychological development and improve their self-esteem. Some researchers have pointed out that an individual's self-esteem level is affected by the family environment in which he grew up. As a system, the total body function of the family has a great influence on the level of individual self-esteem. In recent years, more and more researchers have found that there are certain limitations in the research paradigm of examining one or some family factors alone, so they turn to the family as a system, put forward the concept of family function, and investigate the influence of family as a system on individuals. This review selects the special group of college students as the research object, focuses on the impact of family factors on College Students' self-esteem, and discusses the relationship between College Students' self-esteem and family factors such as family background and family relations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".