Array Calibration and Digital Predistortion Training Using Embedded Near-Field Feedback Probes and Orthogonal Coding for Enhancing the Performance of Millimeter-Wave Beamforming Arrays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This letter proposes an active array calibration and digital predistortion (DPD) training method that relies on a series of measurement data captured using near-field (NF) probes embedded within the array to enhance the performance of millimeter-wave (mm-wave) radio frequency (RF) beamforming arrays. These measurements are obtained using phase settings that are based on orthogonal coding to enable the characterization of the linear and nonlinear errors in the array’s RF chains. The use of embedded NF probes in the proposed method makes it suitable for infield testing. Specifically, the proposed theory is formulated to allow for beamforming-phase-dependent error calibration as well as array linearization without resorting to element-wise measurement or far-field (FF)-based feedback. Furthermore, the proposed theory does not impose a flat coupling requirement between the NF probes and the array antenna elements. Experimental results are conducted on a custom-built 16-element RF beamforming array with four embedded NF probes and operated at 37.5 GHz. The measurements revealed that applying the proposed calibration method reduced the imbalance in the radiation pattern side lobes by up to 2 dB and achieved comparable performance to element-wise FF-based calibration. Furthermore, the proposed DPD training method enabled increasing the effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) from 32 to 34.2 dBm while maintaining an error vector magnitude (EVM) below 3.5%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it