“My Mother, She Butchered Me, My Father, He Ate Me”: Vampires, Fairy Tales, and Feminist Filmmaking in The Moth Diaries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Director Mary Harron's 2011 film The Moth Diaries is a study of adolescent friendship, a vampire tale, and a story of female self-harm. The sensitive subject matters Moth considers, from self-harm in suicide and anorexia to passionate female companionship, intersect and intertwine where sexuality, death, and alimentary consumption are regulated through the normative discourses influencing their representation in cinema. Moth's narrative contours involving two suicidal adolescent girls, one of whom chooses to live, are familiar in heteronormative Anglo-American cinema, yet Harron's supernatural take and its emphasis on female friendships' role in the protagonist's recovery marks a feminist view on the topic. Main character Rebecca is influenced by her father's suicide, and offered a rescue through heterosexual romance, yet with the help of the vampire and her allusions to ATU 720, "The Juniper Tree," Rebecca gains agency and frees herself. Using crucial scenes and an interview with the director, we deconstruct the film's gendered visual economy of representation, rendered by Harron as a feminist resisting more conventional depictions. We see Moth, in its figure of the woman (sometimes lesbian) vampire, and in references to fairy tale, refusing a conventional understanding of young women's self-harm and recovery in passive, heteronormative modes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".