MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Teaching William Morris, edited by Jason D. Martinek and Elizabeth Carolyn Miller

2022· article· en· W4365807963 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillerPoliticsArt historySociologyClassicsArtLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Teaching William Morris ed. by Jason D. Martinek and Elizabeth Carolyn Miller Carolyn Lesjak (bio) Teaching William Morris, edited by Jason D. Martinek and Elizabeth Carolyn Miller; pp. ix + 308. Vancouver: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2019, $105.00, $99.50 paper. Jason D. Martinek and Elizabeth Carolyn Miller's edited collection Teaching William Morris makes good on just about everything it promises, which is no small feat given the range and diversity of Morris's interests and artistic endeavors. The collection aims to provide the "connective tissue" missing from so many approaches to teaching Morris that focus on a part rather than the whole of his work (3). As its title makes clear, this is a book about teaching Morris, and it offers a rich set of essays that cover multiple sites of teaching—from university extension programs in the early twentieth century, to the Hull-House Labor Museum in Chicago and workshops at the Kelmscott House Museum in Hammersmith for school-aged children, to undergraduate and graduate courses at a variety of postsecondary institutions—and multiple paths and modes for introducing students to Morris and capturing the expansiveness of his career. The collection is organized into five broad categories that are meant less to divide up the areas within which Morris worked than to give shape to his "multivarious complexity," and it covers an impressive amount of ground (2). Sections on "Pasts and Presents," "Political Contexts," "Literature," "Art and Design," and "Digital Humanities" touch on Morris's Icelandic sagas; political speeches and writings from The Commonweal (1885–94); poetry; wallpaper designs, tapestries, and other artisanal crafts; architecture; his founding of "the firm" (222); his relationship to the fine arts movement; his utopian novels News from Nowhere (1890) and A Dream of John Ball (1888); and his unorthodox translation of the Odyssey (1887). The list itself says it all in terms of what "multivarious" means when it comes to Morris. Matching this range are the various responses to and forms of engagement with Morris, be it writing a young adult novel about him, as John Plotz discusses; creating the first ever William Morris blog, followed by YouTube videos and Twitter threads, a digital project of Tony Pickney's; looking at how Morris was taught to tenement dwellers in Chicago around 1900, as Elizabeth Helsinger does; or thinking about how he can best be taught today in an era defined by increasing specialization and alienated forms of labor, intellectual and otherwise—in short, the very things at the heart of Morris's critique of his own society. Against these present tendencies, Martinek and Miller's collection hopes to keep in play the "threads of interconnections that pass between and among [the essays]" both within and across the sections of the volume (4). In this brief review, I cannot hope to do justice to all the fine essays brought together here. Instead, I will focus on a number of key themes, challenges, and innovative pedagogical approaches that emerge across the collection. A central question addressed in many of the essays is how we might get current students interested in Morris at all, a considerable task. Deanna Kreisel begins her essay on News from Nowhere by bluntly stating that "literary utopias are boring," and that Morris's is no exception, as her [End Page 459] undergraduate students made clear in no uncertain terms (161). Given this shared experience, many of the essays helpfully describe different attempts to pique students' interest in Morris. KellyAnn Fitzpatrick invites students to read Morris's medievalism against J. R. R. Tolkien in order to see how "various manifestations of medievalism have made their way into contemporary fantasy" (70). David Latham focuses on five key transformations that Morris envisions—some of which seemed far-fetched during Morris's day but have now come to pass—in order to illustrate the power of the utopian ideal and to prompt students to think about where we "find our inspiration for thinking, for living, for improving the world" (116). As he concludes, "If we can change the weather, and our health and our height, then we may answer 'yes, surely,' we can find time to consider a different kind of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it