MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4365807963 · doi:10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.07

Teaching William Morris, edited by Jason D. Martinek and Elizabeth Carolyn Miller

2022· article· en· W4365807963 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carolyn Lesjak

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueArt, Politics, and Modernism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMillerPoliticsArt historySociologyClassicsArtLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Teaching William Morris ed. by Jason D. Martinek and Elizabeth Carolyn Miller Carolyn Lesjak (bio) Teaching William Morris, edited by Jason D. Martinek and Elizabeth Carolyn Miller; pp. ix + 308. Vancouver: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2019, $105.00, $99.50 paper. Jason D. Martinek and Elizabeth Carolyn Miller's edited collection Teaching William Morris makes good on just about everything it promises, which is no small feat given the range and diversity of Morris's interests and artistic endeavors. The collection aims to provide the "connective tissue" missing from so many approaches to teaching Morris that focus on a part rather than the whole of his work (3). As its title makes clear, this is a book about teaching Morris, and it offers a rich set of essays that cover multiple sites of teaching—from university extension programs in the early twentieth century, to the Hull-House Labor Museum in Chicago and workshops at the Kelmscott House Museum in Hammersmith for school-aged children, to undergraduate and graduate courses at a variety of postsecondary institutions—and multiple paths and modes for introducing students to Morris and capturing the expansiveness of his career. The collection is organized into five broad categories that are meant less to divide up the areas within which Morris worked than to give shape to his "multivarious complexity," and it covers an impressive amount of ground (2). Sections on "Pasts and Presents," "Political Contexts," "Literature," "Art and Design," and "Digital Humanities" touch on Morris's Icelandic sagas; political speeches and writings from The Commonweal (1885–94); poetry; wallpaper designs, tapestries, and other artisanal crafts; architecture; his founding of "the firm" (222); his relationship to the fine arts movement; his utopian novels News from Nowhere (1890) and A Dream of John Ball (1888); and his unorthodox translation of the Odyssey (1887). The list itself says it all in terms of what "multivarious" means when it comes to Morris. Matching this range are the various responses to and forms of engagement with Morris, be it writing a young adult novel about him, as John Plotz discusses; creating the first ever William Morris blog, followed by YouTube videos and Twitter threads, a digital project of Tony Pickney's; looking at how Morris was taught to tenement dwellers in Chicago around 1900, as Elizabeth Helsinger does; or thinking about how he can best be taught today in an era defined by increasing specialization and alienated forms of labor, intellectual and otherwise—in short, the very things at the heart of Morris's critique of his own society. Against these present tendencies, Martinek and Miller's collection hopes to keep in play the "threads of interconnections that pass between and among [the essays]" both within and across the sections of the volume (4). In this brief review, I cannot hope to do justice to all the fine essays brought together here. Instead, I will focus on a number of key themes, challenges, and innovative pedagogical approaches that emerge across the collection. A central question addressed in many of the essays is how we might get current students interested in Morris at all, a considerable task. Deanna Kreisel begins her essay on News from Nowhere by bluntly stating that "literary utopias are boring," and that Morris's is no exception, as her [End Page 459] undergraduate students made clear in no uncertain terms (161). Given this shared experience, many of the essays helpfully describe different attempts to pique students' interest in Morris. KellyAnn Fitzpatrick invites students to read Morris's medievalism against J. R. R. Tolkien in order to see how "various manifestations of medievalism have made their way into contemporary fantasy" (70). David Latham focuses on five key transformations that Morris envisions—some of which seemed far-fetched during Morris's day but have now come to pass—in order to illustrate the power of the utopian ideal and to prompt students to think about where we "find our inspiration for thinking, for living, for improving the world" (116). As he concludes, "If we can change the weather, and our health and our height, then we may answer 'yes, surely,' we can find time to consider a different kind of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,063
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,209

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0630,031

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian StudiesMême sujetArt, Politics, and ModernismTravaux en français237 207