MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365815047 · doi:10.15402/esj.v8i4.70782

Minds Alive: Libraries and Archives Now by Patricia Demers and Toni Samek (Eds.). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2020. 268pp. ISBN: 978-1-4875-0527-1.

2023· article· en· W4365815047 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Joel Salt

Bibliographic record

VenueEngaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceMedia studiesHistoryComputer scienceArt historySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Minds Alive comes at an important time for libraries and archives, which reside in both the world of books and kilometers of fonds and yet also need to adapt to the massive amounts of born-digital content that too require collection. This monograph, which features thirteen chapters split into five sections, also comes at an important time for memory institutions struggling to adjust to the Googlization of information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.083
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0830.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.1430.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.109
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and LearningSame topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207