Bibliographic record
Abstract
This poster presentation will trace the historical interpretive arc inspired by Exodus 12:1-2 and its commandment to observe the new moon and keep a calendar. An examination of religious sensibilities as filtered through the prism of these two Bible verses, this presentation will outline manifold interpretations found in Jewish and early Christian literature from the Biblical era through medieval times. The literary sources to be examined will span the poetic and fanciful sensibility of Midrash, the magical and literary bent of the Pseudepigrapha, as well as the thematic reframing of lunar motifs in the Patristic literature. Other religious and literary writings to be summarized will include those of ancient Jewish commentators such as the Tannaim, Amoraim, and later Medieval thinkers, as well as those of the Church Fathers and Biblical faith groups such as the Samaritans. Throughout, the emphasis will be upon understanding the interpretive literary trajectory of these verses, as well as upon the light these religious, calendrical and astronomical interpretations have shed upon the writers’ changing understanding of humanity¹s place in the cosmos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".