A pose and shear-based tactile robotic system for object tracking, surface following and object pushing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tactile perception is a crucial sensing modality in robotics, particularly in scenarios that require precise manipulation and safe interaction with objects. Previous research has focused extensively on tactile-based estimation of end-effector contact poses with other objects, as it is a crucial capability needed for tasks such as traversing an object’s surface or edge, manipulating an object in a specific way, or moving an object along a predetermined path. However, tactilebased estimation of post-contact shear, which is an equally important capability for tasks such as object tracking and manipulation, has received less attention. Indeed, post-contact shear has often been considered a ”nuisance variable” and is removed if possible because it can have an adverse effect on other types of tactile perception such as contact pose estimation. This paper proposes a tactile robotic system that can simultaneously estimate both contact pose and post-contact shear, and utilize this information to control its interaction with other objects. Additionally, the new system is capable of interacting with objects smoothly and continuously, unlike the stepwise, position-controlled systems used in the past. The capabilities of the new system are demonstrated using several different controller configurations, including object tracking, surface following, single-arm object pushing, and dual-arm pushing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".