MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366086414 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.03.016

SRSF1 haploinsufficiency is responsible for a syndromic developmental disorder associated with intellectual disability

2023· article· en· W4366086414 on OpenAlexafffund
Elke Bogaert, Aurore Garde, Thierry Gautier, Kathleen Rooney, Yannis Duffourd, Pontus LeBlanc, Emma van Reempts, Frédéric Tran Mau‐Them, Ingrid M. Wentzensen, Kit Sing Au, Kate Richardson, Hope Northrup, Vincent Gâtinois, David Geneviève, Raymond J. Louie, Michael J. Lyons, Lone Walentin Laulund, Charlotte Brasch‐Andersen, Trine Juul, Fatima El It, Nathalie Marle, Patrick Callier, Raissa Relator, Sadegheh Haghshenas, Haley McConkey, Jennifer Kerkhof, Claudia Cesario, Antonio Novelli, Nicola Brunetti‐Pierri, Michele Pinelli, Perrine Pennamen, Sophie Naudion, Marine Legendre, Cécile Courdier, Aurélien Trimouille, Martine Doco Fenzy, Lynn Pais, Alison Yeung, Kimberly Nugent, Elizabeth Roeder, Tadahiro Mitani, Jennifer E. Posey, Daniel G. Calame, Hagith Yonath, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Luciana Musante, Flavio Faletra, Francesca Montanari, Giovanna Sartor, Alessandra Vancini, Marco Seri, Claude Besmond, Karine Poirier, Laurence Hubert, Dimitri Hemelsoet, Arnold Münnich, James R. Lupski, Christophe Philippe, Christel Thauvin‐Robinet, Laurence Faivre, Bekim Sadiković, Jérôme Govin, Bart Dermaut, Antonio Vitobello

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Eye InstituteNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteOntario Genomics InstituteFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Human Genome Research InstituteAgence Nationale de la RechercheBaylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian GenomicsGovernment of CanadaVlaamse regeringUniversiteit GentEuropean CommissionBroad InstituteBijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGentNational Institutes of HealthOntario GenomicsGenome Canada
KeywordsHaploinsufficiencyMissense mutationBiologyGeneticsRNA splicingExonic splicing enhancerFrameshift mutationPhenotypeLoss functionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SRSF1 (also known as ASF/SF2) is a non-small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (non-snRNP) that belongs to the arginine/serine (R/S) domain family. It recognizes and binds to mRNA, regulating both constitutive and alternative splicing. The complete loss of this proto-oncogene in mice is embryonically lethal. Through international data sharing, we identified 17 individuals (10 females and 7 males) with a neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) with heterozygous germline SRSF1 variants, mostly de novo, including three frameshift variants, three nonsense variants, seven missense variants, and two microdeletions within region 17q22 encompassing SRSF1. Only in one family, the de novo origin could not be established. All individuals featured a recurrent phenotype including developmental delay and intellectual disability (DD/ID), hypotonia, neurobehavioral problems, with variable skeletal (66.7%) and cardiac (46%) anomalies. To investigate the functional consequences of SRSF1 variants, we performed in silico structural modeling, developed an in vivo splicing assay in Drosophila, and carried out episignature analysis in blood-derived DNA from affected individuals. We found that all loss-of-function and 5 out of 7 missense variants were pathogenic, leading to a loss of SRSF1 splicing activity in Drosophila, correlating with a detectable and specific DNA methylation episignature. In addition, our orthogonal in silico, in vivo, and epigenetics analyses enabled the separation of clearly pathogenic missense variants from those with uncertain significance. Overall, these results indicated that haploinsufficiency of SRSF1 is responsible for a syndromic NDD with ID due to a partial loss of SRSF1-mediated splicing activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207