MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366113976 · doi:10.1080/00085006.2023.2169477

The feelings of progress: peripheral temporalities during late socialism

2023· article· en· W4366113976 on OpenAlex
Tatiana Voronina, Benjamin Martin Kaelin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporalitiesFeelingSocialismPeripheralAestheticsPolitical sciencePsychologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophySocial psychologyMedicineInternal medicineLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the different ways time is understood across cultures and even across academic disciplines, it is a human universal.Along with space, it sets the coordinates by which we understand the world and our place in it.The cluster of articles that follow examine how people who lived on the periphery of the Soviet Union from the 1960s to the 1980s used time to make sense of their lives and the reality in which they found themselves.In examining the "temporal regimes," both static and evolving, of the Vologda oblast, Lithuania, and Karelia in late socialism, these articles shed new light on how Soviet citizens interpreted their place in time and employed conceptualizations of temporality to effect changes in time.One of the most important means by which people mobilize and make sense of time, both privately and socially, is narrative.Narrative relates events sequentially, through emplotment it assigns meaning to certain events while denying it to others, and implicitly it validates a particular epistemological system. 1 Depending on the problems people hope to solve, time can function very differently in the narratives they create about reality.When constructing the history of a collective, for example, people instrumentalize time to create hierarchies, indicate trajectories of development, and shape identity. 2 In other words, time is not an ideologically or morally neutral category.Time is part of knowledgethat is, it is a category that helps one discourse dominate others.Like knowledge, time is connected with power.According to Michel Foucault, dominant knowledge is based not on truth but on power.Such knowledge becomes the mainstay of the state, which subjugates ideas of time, development, and progress to its own ends. 3Developing this idea, the anthropologist Johannes Fabian points to the inequality of time regimes.He argues that the Eurocentrism of world and global time is manifested in the fact that anthropologists "colonize" local temporal representations of non-European peoples and cultures, embedding them into a global analytical system based on European time. 4 In the context of Soviet history, Nikolai Ssorin-Chaikov sees an example of dominant temporal knowledge in the way elites presented "modernity" and "progress" to the people as "gifts," in exchange for popular gratitude and loyalty. 5 The papers in this collection identify different ways in which the Soviet temporal regime affected local interactions with time, sometimes displacing "subjugated" forms of knowledge, sometimes being displaced, and sometimes going unquestioned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it