Iridium/Zinc-Co-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Reactions of Oxabicyclic Alkenes with Indole Nucleophiles: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental and theoretical investigation on the iridium/zinc-co-catalyzed ring-opening reactions of oxabicyclic alkenes with indole nucleophiles is reported. The reaction affords trans -3-indolyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalen-1-ol products in good yield with no N -alkylated products observed. The C–C bond-forming reaction does not require prior functionalization and is entirely atom-economic. The mechanism and origins of selectivity in the iridium-catalyzed ring-opening reaction have been examined at the M06-D3/Def2TZVPP level of theory. Orbital analysis and natural population analysis charges demonstrate that the C α site of the π-allyliridium intermediate is the most electrophilic site of attack. Distortion/interaction analysis reveals that the chemoselectivity likely originates from an earlier-stage transition state between C α and C 3, which requires less distortion energy compared to C α –N 1 during the rate-determining intermolecular nucleophilic attack. Moreover, conceptual density functional theory was used to conceptualize the preferential reactive sites of the nucleophiles probed. The C–C bond-forming step is speculated to proceed through a Friedel–Crafts-type reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".