A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Based Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Operation of an Integrated Natural Gas and Electricity Network in Presence of Demand Response Programs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The power companies try to reduce the power generation cost to satisfy the costumers and increase the profit. For this purpose, various acts including energy management strategies, power loss reduction plans, efficiency increasing of the gird components, etc. have been done in the past. Currently, the integration of natural gas and electricity networks for simultaneous operation is one of the most effective approach. In the integrated networks, the natural gas and electricity are managed simultaneously, making it more beneficial for both suppliers and customers. In this paper, the supplied and demanded natural gas and electricity are managed simultaneously to reach more benefits from both technical and economic perspectives. The studied integrated network includes power plants, gas supplier, gas storage, water electrolyzer, fuel cell units, wind energy and hydrogen vehicles. A comprehensive investigation is carried out to optimal energy management in a modern integrated energy systems, the hydrogen vehicles, as a new transportation vehicle, is included in the system. Both natural gas and electricity demands are supplied optimally using the proposed optimization algorithm. The demand response programs are considered as the flexible loads to increase the system profits. The optimal operation problem is modeled as a mixed integer linear programming problem and is optimized using GAMS programming software. The proposed methodology is simulated in various scenarios and its robustness and effectiveness are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".