First Hyperpolarizability of Carbonaceous Nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines Zadie Smith's novel The Fraud (2023), focusing on how the character Eliza Touchet becomes a symbol of resistance against the strict gender norms of the Victorian era. In the midst of a patriarchal social structure that limits women's roles to the domestic space, Eliza's character presents the tension between the gender constructs imposed by society and her expression of individual identity. This study aims to (1) examine how the character of Eliza Touchet reflects the tension between social gender constructs and the individual struggle for selfexpression in Victorian society, and (2) apply Judith Butler's theory of gender performativity to explain how Eliza Touchet's resistance challenges patriarchal norms. The research method used is qualitative with a text study approach. The analysis is framed by Susan S. Lanser's feminist narratology and Judith Butler's Gender Performativity Theory to interpret Eliza's acts of resistance. The primary data for this research are narrative and dialogue excerpts from the novel The Fraud, while the secondary data include academic journals and books relevant to gender theory and Victorian literature. The character of Eliza Touchet represents resistance to Victorian gender norms through intelligent and layered gender performativity. She proves that identity can be a brilliant “deception,” a performance that both conceals and reveals subversive truths, and shows that resistance can be found in the way a person lives their daily life. Keywords: Gender Performativity, Resistance, Victorian Era
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".