MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366147954 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3267564

On the Performance of End-to-End Cooperative NOMA-Based IoT Networks With Wireless Energy Harvesting

2023· article· en· W4366147954 on OpenAlexaff
Sutanu Ghosh, Arafat Al‐Dweik, Mohamed‐Slim Alouini

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersKhalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
KeywordsTelecommunications linkComputer scienceEnergy harvestingNakagami distributionFadingStochastic geometryMonte Carlo methodWirelessInternet of ThingsComputer networkEnd-to-end principleWireless networkSpectral efficiencyTransmission (telecommunications)Energy (signal processing)TelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies the end-to-end uplink (UL) and downlink (DL)-outage probability (OP) of an Internet of Things (IoT) network with radio-frequency (RF) energy harvesting (EH) over Nakagami-m fading channels. Power-domain nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) is adopted to support both the UL and DL transmissions to increase the network spectral efficiency. The system end-to-end UL and DL outage probabilities are analyzed where exact closed-form expressions are derived. The system performance is explored for various system parameters, such as time allocation for EH, transmission power, fading conditions, number of IoT devices (IoDs), and data rate. The obtained analytical results are corroborated using Monte Carlo simulation for various operating scenarios. The obtained results show that the optimum harvesting time may broadly vary based on the adopted system parameters. Moreover, the results show that the system OP is highly sensitive to the harvesting time where OP may vary drastically if the harvesting time deviates from the optimum. The impact of the perfect successive interference cancelation (SIC) (PSIC) is also evaluated and compared with imperfect SIC (ISIC), and the obtained results show that the OP of the system can be significantly underestimated with the PSIC assumption. Therefore, the commonly used PSIC assumption may cause substantial deviation from the practical case where the detection process experiences ISIC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207