MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366186919 · doi:10.1017/rqx.2023.102

: <i>Gabriele Zerbi: Über die Kautelen der Ärzte / “De cautelis medicorum” (ca. 1495): Edition und Übersetzung</i>

2023· article· de· W4366186919 on OpenAlexaff
Mitchell Lewis Hammond

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance Quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStuttgartPhilosophyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gabriele Zerbi: Über die Kautelen der Ärzte / “De cautelis medicorum” (ca. 1495): Edition und Übersetzung. Mariacarla Gadebusch Bondio, Manuel Förg, and Christian Kaiser, eds. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2019. 176 pp. €39. - Volume 76 Issue 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1030.062

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance QuarterlySame topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207