Bibliographic record
Abstract
0.1 Map of this book.10 1.1 Conducting conduct through the apparatus of education.32 3.1 Representation of Jacques Rancière's politics of dissensus.64 4.1 Dimensions of Relations of Self.82 5.1 Gilles Deleuze's "diagram of Foucault" or "diagram of the fold" relating aspects of being and subjectivity.96 5.2 The fold of subjectivity as forces of the social and material outside turned/folded inward.99 5.3 A. Rhizome in relation to root-stem-flower B. A tangle of rhizomes C. Closed "Arboreal" system D. Open rhizomatic system.108 5.4 Rhizomes giving rise to virtual and actual becoming(s).(Diagram inspired by Marc Ngui.) 114 6.1 Two hypothetical and interrelated plains of emergence: Ecological crisis and human evolution.121 6.2 School as assemblage, with its different parts and varying capacities.124 6.3 Assemblages can be overcoded or free-flowing in their materiality and expression.127 6.4 Politics of HIV transmission as assemblage.134 7.1 A depiction of Toronto occupied by a late twenty-third century imperial army in the film Wakening.148 7.2 Collective life in Psychopompolis.150
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.887 | 0.791 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".