Individual and community-level factors associated with caesarean section in Haiti: secondary analysis of data from the 2016–2017 Haitian Demographic and Health Survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: For several decades, the rate of caesarean section (CS) has been increasing in the world. In some countries, the CS rate is below the WHO recommended range (10-15%), while in other countries, it is significantly higher. The aim of this paper was to identify individual and community-level factors associated with CS in Haiti. METHODS: Secondary data analysis was conducted on nationally representative cross-sectional survey data from the 2016-2017 Haitian Demographic and Health Survey (HDHS). The analysis was restricted to 6303 children born in 5 years prior the survey (of the interviewed women). The study population' characteristics, and the prevalence of CS were analysed using descriptive analysis (univariate/bivariate). In addition, multilevel binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with CS. Both descriptive and multivariate analysis were conducted using STATA 16.0 software (Stata Corp, Tex, USA). Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of CS delivery was estimated at 5.4% (95% CI 4.8-6.0) in Haiti. Results also revealed that mothers aged 35 and above (aOR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.00-1.96); who attended secondary (aOR = 1.95; 95% CI 1.39-2.76) and higher education level (aOR = 3.25; 95% CI 1.92-5.49); who were covered by health insurance (aOR = 2.57; 95% CI 1.57-4.19); with less than 3 children (aOR = 4.13; 95% CI 2.18-7.85) or 3-4 children (aOR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.09-3.94); who received 9 or more antenatal visits (aOR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.40-3.50) were significantly more likely to deliver by CS. Children in communities with high preponderance of private health facilities had greater odds to be delivered through CS (aOR = 1.90; 95% CI 1.25-2.85). Furthermore, children with an average birth weight (aOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.91) were less likely to be delivered through CS than their counterparts with high birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: While the CS prevalence was low in Haiti, it masks significant geographic, social and economic disparities. To better develop and implement maternal and child health programs that address CS deliveries, the government authorities and NGOs operating in the field of women's health in Haiti should take these disparities into account.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".