MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366221507 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.218

Multi-scalar mixing in turbulent coaxial jets

2023· article· en· W4366221507 on OpenAlexafffund
Alaïs Hewes, Laurent Mydlarski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsPhysicsTurbulenceCoaxialScalar (mathematics)Jet (fluid)MechanicsMixing (physics)Momentum (technical analysis)HeliumAtomic physicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although natural and industrial flows often transport and mix multiple scalars, relatively few studies of turbulent multi-scalar mixing have been undertaken. In the present work, a novel three-wire thermal-anemometry-based probe – capable of simultaneously measuring velocity, helium concentration and temperature – is used to investigate the evolution of multiple scalars ( $\phi _1$ , $\phi _2$ , $\phi _3$ ) and velocity in turbulent coaxial jets. The jets consist of (i) a centre jet containing a mixture of helium and air ( $\phi _1$ ), (ii) an annular jet containing pure (unheated) air ( $\phi _2$ ) and (iii) a coflow of (pure) heated air ( $\phi _3$ ). Axial measurements are made at three different momentum flux ratios ( $M=0.77, 2.1, 4.2$ ). Increasing $M$ was observed to result in complex, competing effects. Larger momentum flux ratios cause the potential core of the centre jet to decrease in size, greater scalar fluctuations and more rapid correlation of $\phi _1$ and $\phi _2$ . However, at the same time, certain statistics, including those describing the velocity field, evolve more slowly. Moreover, the flow near the beginning of the fully merged region appears to be less mixed at higher values of $M$ . The present work finally demonstrates that differences can be observed in the evolution and mixing of coaxial jets between those in which $M<1$ and those in which $M>1$ , thereby presenting an opportunity by which the mixing process in coaxial jets may be controlled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207