MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366224338 · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02914-z

JBrowse 2: a modular genome browser with views of synteny and structural variation

2023· article· en· W4366224338 on OpenAlexafffund
Colin Diesh, Garrett Stevens, Peter Xie, Teresa De Jesus Martinez, Elliot A. Hershberg, Angel Leung, Emma Guo, Shihab Dider, Junjun Zhang, Caroline Bridge, Gregory Hogue, Andrew Duncan, Matthew Morgan, Tia Flores, Benjamin N. Bimber, Robin Haw, Scott Cain, Robert Buels, Lincoln Stein, Ian Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome biology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer InstituteNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthHospital for Sick ChildrenNational Human Genome Research InstituteJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsSyntenyGenome browserVisualizationGenomeAnnotationBiologyVariation (astronomy)Modular designStructural variationGenome BiologyWorld Wide WebHuman geneticsWeb applicationGene AnnotationComputer scienceComputational biologyThe InternetGenomicsData scienceBioinformaticsGeneticsGeneData miningProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present JBrowse 2, a general-purpose genome annotation browser offering enhanced visualization of complex structural variation and evolutionary relationships. It retains core features of JBrowse while adding new views for synteny, dotplots, breakpoints, gene fusions, and whole-genome overviews. It allows users to share sessions, open multiple genomes, and navigate between views. It can be embedded in a web page, used as a standalone application, or run from Jupyter notebooks or R sessions. These improvements are enabled by a ground-up redesign using modern web technology. We describe application functionality, use cases, performance benchmarks, and implementation notes for web administrators and developers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations876
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome biologySame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207