MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366228237 · doi:10.1007/s00125-023-05894-8

Evidence-based European recommendations for the dietary management of diabetes

2023· article· en· W4366228237 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anne‐Marie Aas, Mette Axelsen, Chaitong Churuangsuk, Kjeld Hermansen, Cyril W.C. Kendall, Hana Kahleová, Tauseef Khan, Michael E. J. Lean, Jim Mann, Eva Ringdal Pedersen, Andreas Pfeiffer, Dario Rahelić, Andrew Reynolds, Ulf Risérus, Angela A. Rivellese, Jordi Salas‐Salvadó, Ursula Schwab, John L. Sievenpiper, Anastasia Thanopoulou, Emeritus Matti Uusitupa

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetologia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationObesity CanadaStrategic Research CouncilInternational Sweeteners AssociationAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensDiabetesliittoEuropean Association for the Study of DiabetesInternational Nut and Dried Fruit CouncilUppsala UniversitetVetenskapsrådetNovo NordiskDiabetesforbundetInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasUniversity of South AustraliaGeneralitat de CatalunyaUniversity of TorontoU.S. Department of AgricultureUniversity of GlasgowCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchInstituto DanoneNational Honey BoardLoblaw Companies LimitedCanola Council of CanadaUnited Soybean BoardInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and DiabetesSoy Nutrition InstituteUniversity of AdelaideDairy Farmers of CanadaDiabetes-StiftungAmgenPeanut InstituteInstitut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere VirgiliDanoneEuropean Foundation for the Study of DiabetesInstitute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition SciencesAlmond Board of CaliforniaInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIDiabetes CanadaAlberta Pulse Growers CommissionEli Lilly and CompanyCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyItä-Suomen YliopistoGeneral MillsUniversitat Rovira i VirgiliWorld Health OrganizationSanofiAgence Nationale de la RecherchePhysicians Committee for Responsible MedicineAstraZenecaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDiabetes UKPepsiCo
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusGrading (engineering)Diabetes managementSystematic reviewDietary managementPopulationType 2 diabetesMEDLINEEnvironmental healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.049
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.066
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0490.066
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.011
Bibliometrics0.0130.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0090.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations241
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDiabetologiaSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207