MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O DOMICÍLIO INVADIDO: A DOCÊNCIA E O HOME OFFICE NA PANDEMIA DO CORONAVIRUS

2023· article· pt· W4366268805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Foco · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Burnout
Canadian institutionsMcGill-Queen's University Press
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo teve como objetivo refletir como o trabalho em home office do afetou o processo de trabalho docente e suas consequências de aspectos físicos e psicossocial. Para tanto, utilizou-se de uma revisão da literatura nas plataformas SciELO e BVS com coleta de dados realizada em abril de 2022. Como resultado, verificou-se que os docentes em home office no período de pandemia tiveram um aumento da carga de trabalho e um impacto em sua saúde mental. É importante que se tenha um olhar diferenciado para o docente em home office resguardando-os de metas abusivas e da pressão psicológica imposta pelas instituições para as quais prestam serviços.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it