MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366274198 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2806476/v1

A Multi-model Distributed Controller for Swarm Navigation: Obstacle Clearance Strategy

2023· preprint· en· W4366274198 on OpenAlexaff
Truong Nhu, Duy Anh Nguyễn, Pham Duy Hung, Trung Dung Ngo

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstacleSwarm behaviourController (irrigation)Obstacle avoidanceComputer sciencePosition (finance)Path (computing)Control theory (sociology)Boundary (topology)RobotDistributed computingControl (management)Mobile robotArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer networkBusinessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper considers a multi-model Distributed Controller for swarm Navigation using the obstacle Clearance strategy (DCNC). If there is an obstacle blocking the swarm’s path, some agents are collectively assigned to push the obstacle away from its original position creating free space for the rest of the swarm navigating towards the destination. To clear the obstacle, we developed a distributed obstacle-pushing strategy consisting of a self-identified push section on an obstacle’s boundary and a collective pushing force control. Our pushing strategy ensures the uniform distribution of robots on the self-identified push section, resulting in the maximum pushing force over the pushing direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207