MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366288312 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2817928/v1

On a Property of Congruence Lattices of Slim, Planar, Semimodular Lattices

2023· preprint· en· W4366288312 on OpenAlexaff
George Grätzer

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCongruence (geometry)Lemma (botany)PlanarMathematicsCombinatoricsProperty (philosophy)Pure mathematicsComputer scienceGeometryEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> In a 2121 paper with G´abor Cz´edli, we introduced and verified the Three-pendant Three-crown Property, 3P3C, for congruence lattices of slim (no M<sub>3 </sub>sublattice), planar, semimodular lattices. The proof is very long; in part, because it relies on Cz´edli’s 2021 paper on lamps. This paper verifies 3P3C using the Swing Lemma, an elementary and short approach. 2020 <italic>Mathematics Subject Classification. </italic>06C10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicAdvanced Algebra and LogicFrench-language works237,207