MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4366290943 · doi:10.1101/2023.04.12.23288299

Clinical and electrophysiological features of <i>SCN8A</i> variants causing episodic or chronic ataxia

2023· preprint· en· W4366290943 on OpenAlexaff
Hang Lyu, Christian M. Boßelmann, Katrine M. Johannesen, Mahmoud Koko, Juan Darío Ortigoza‐Escobar, Sergio Aguilera, Deyanira Garcia-Navas Núñez, Tarja Linnankivi, Eija Gaily, Henriette JA van Ruiten, Ruth Richardson, Cornelia Betzler, Gabriella Horváth, Eva H. Brilstra, Niels Geerdink, Daniele Orsucci, Alessandra Tessa, Elena Gardella, Zofia Fleszar, Lüdger Schöls, Holger Lerche, Rikke S. Møller, Yuanyuan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
FundersMinistero della SaluteDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsAtaxiaPhenotypeExcitatory postsynaptic potentialGenotypeElectrophysiologyInhibitory postsynaptic potentialNeuroscienceGeneticsBiologyMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective Variants in SCN8A are associated with a spectrum of epilepsies and neurodevelopmental disorders. Ataxia as a predominant symptom of SCN8A variation has not been well studied. We set out to investigate disease mechanisms and genotype-phenotype correlations of SCN8A -related ataxia. Methods We collected genetic and electro-clinical data of ten individuals from nine unrelated families carrying novel SCN8A variants associated with chronic progressive or episodic ataxia. Electrophysiological characterizations of these variants were performed in ND7/23 cells and cultured neurons. Results Variants associated with chronic progressive ataxia either significantly decreased Na + current densities and shifted activation curves towards more depolarized potentials (p.Asn995Asp, p.Lys1498Glu and p.Trp1266Cys) or resulted in a premature stop codon (p.Trp937Ter), i.e. strong loss-of-function (LOF) effects. Three variants (p.Arg847Gln and biallelic p.Arg191Trp/p.Asp1525Tyr) were associated with episodic ataxia causing LOF by decreasing Na + current densities or a hyperpolarizing shift of the inactivation curve. Two additional episodic ataxia-associated variants caused mixed gain-and loss-of function effects in ND7/23 cells and were further examined in primary murine hippocampal neuronal cultures. Neuronal firing in excitatory neurons was increased by p.Arg1629His, but decreased by p.Glu1201Lys. Neuronal firing in inhibitory neurons was decreased for both variants. No functional effect was observed for p.Arg1913Trp. In four individuals, treatment with sodium channel blockers exacerbated symptoms. Interpretation We identified episodic or chronic ataxia as new phenotypes caused by variants in SCN8A . Genotype-phenotype correlations revealed a more pronounced LOF effect for variants causing chronic ataxia. Sodium channel blockers should be avoided under these conditions. Summary for Social Media Twitter handles @cmbosselmann, @FiladelfiaGene1, @Katrine92658231, @Elegardella What is the current knowledge on the topic? Variants in SCN8A , a gene encoding the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.6, are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, including epilepsy, intellectual disability, and autism spectrum disorder. What question did this study address? This study investigated whether SCN8A variants can cause predominant episodic or chronic ataxia, as well as the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these variants. What does this study add to our knowledge? Episodic or chronic ataxia as a sole or predominant symptom caused by NaV1.6 channel loss-of-function comprise new phenotypes in the broad spectrum associated with SCN8A dysfunction. Genotype-phenotype correlations help to differentiate between chronic and episodic ataxia. How might this potentially impact on the practice of neurology? Loss-of-function SCN8A variants may represent an underdiagnosed etiology in hereditary ataxia. Treatment with sodium channel blockers, commonly prescribed in other types of episodic ataxia, may harm these individuals, and should be avoided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→