MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4366291455 · doi:10.1101/2023.04.13.23288435

Optimizing Detection and Deep Learning-based Classification of Pathological High-Frequency Oscillations in Epilepsy

2023· preprint· en· W4366291455 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tonmoy Monsoor, Yipeng Zhang, Atsuro Daida, Shingo Oana, Qiujing Lu, Shaun A. Hussain, Aria Fallah, Raman Sankar, Richard J. Staba, William Speier, Vwani Roychowdhury, Hiroki Nariai

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologicalDetectorEpilepsyIctalEpilepsy surgeryArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MedicinePathologyComputer scienceNeuroscienceOpticsPhysicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study aimed to explore sensitive detection methods and deep learning (DL)-based classification for pathological high-frequency oscillations (HFOs). Methods: We analyzed interictal HFOs (80-500 Hz) in 15 children with medication-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent resection after chronic intracranial electroencephalogram via subdural grids. The HFOs were assessed using the short-term energy (STE) and Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) detectors and examined for pathological features based on spike association and time-frequency plot characteristics. A DL-based classification was applied to purify pathological HFOs. Postoperative seizure outcomes were correlated with HFO-resection ratios to determine the optimal HFO detection method. Results: The MNI detector identified a higher percentage of pathological HFOs than the STE detector, but some pathological HFOs were detected only by the STE detector. HFOs detected by both detectors exhibited the most pathological features. The Union detector, which detects HFOs identified by either the MNI or STE detector, outperformed other detectors in predicting postoperative seizure outcomes using HFO-resection ratios before and after DL-based purification. Conclusions: HFOs detected by standard automated detectors displayed different signal and morphological characteristics. DL-based classification effectively purified pathological HFOs. Significance: Enhancing the detection and classification methods of HFOs will improve their utility in predicting postoperative seizure outcomes. HIGHLIGHTS: HFOs detected by the MNI detector showed different traits and higher pathological bias than those detected by the STE detectorHFOs detected by both MNI and STE detectors (the Intersection HFOs) were deemed the most pathologicalA deep learning-based classification was able to distill pathological HFOs, regard-less of the initial HFO detection methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→