MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366312108 · doi:10.3103/s1068373923010077

Iran’s Changing Climate over the Past 30 Years

2023· article· en· W4366312108 on OpenAlexaff
Pedram Attarod, A. Dezhban, Thomas G. Pypker, Sh. Kh. Sigaroodi, Vilma Bayramzadeh, Qiuhong Tang, Xiaomang Liu, Hamid Soofi Mariv

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Meteorology and Hydrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimatologyClimate changeEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeographyPhysical geographyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, monthly meteorological parameters of temperature, precipitation, and wind speed recorded at 104 synoptic weather stations scattered across Iran were analyzed to construct annual time series of the meteorological data for a 30-year period (1988–2017) using the Mann–Kendall test and the Sen’s slope estimator. Based on the de Martonne aridity index ( $$I_\mathrm{DM}$$ ) classification, Iran’s climate is mostly categorized as dry and semi-dry. The results indicated annual temperature significantly increased at about 61% of stations and annual precipitation significantly decreased at 21% of stations (at the 95% and 99% significance level). The decline in precipitation occurred in mostly the dry (27%) and semi-dry (21%) regions of Iran. Approximately half of the stations experienced significant increases in wind speed with arid areas experiencing broadest increase. Prediction of future impacts of climate change is needed for this region to mitigate negative effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Meteorology and HydrologySame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207