MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A importância da Publicidade nas questões de Responsabilidade Social

2023· article· pt· W4366337786 on OpenAlexaff
Ariana Gonçalves Almeida

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Através de pesquisas bibliográficas sobre a responsabilidade social corporativa, este artigo busca compreender o conceito e a importância do tema, além de enfatizar o impacto da linguagem e de uma comunicação eficaz para se dirigir ao público. Essas premissas são cruciais para causar o efeito na publicidade de um produto ou serviço, visto que para uma empresa se manter no mercado atual deve atentar-se a aspectos sociais, além da lucratividade, em face a redução dos problemas existentes na população. Romper paradigmas se tornou essencial para conquistar credibilidade e notoriedade. Por isso, causas coletivas devem ser levadas em consideração, pois a ética e a cultura organizacional são imprescindíveis para agregar valor à sociedade como um todo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do ConhecimentoSame topicBusiness and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207