Focal versus craniospinal radiation for disseminated atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor following favorable response to systemic therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) is associated with improved survival in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT); however, optimal RT delivery is unknown. A meta-analysis was conducted for disseminated (M+) ATRT receiving focal or craniospinal radiation (CSI). METHODS: After abstract screening, 25 studies (1995-2020) contained necessary patient, disease, and radiation treatment information (N = 96). All abstract, full text, and data capture were independently double-reviewed. The corresponding author was contacted for cases of insufficient information. Response to pre-radiation chemotherapy (N = 57) was categorized as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Univariate and multivariate statistics were performed to investigate survival correlation. Patients with M4 disease were excluded. RESULTS: The 2- and 4-year overall survival (OS) was 63.8% and 45.7%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 2 years (range 0.3-13.5). The median age was 2 years (range 0.2-19.5), and 96% received chemotherapy. On univariate analysis, gross total resection (GTR, p = .0007), pre-radiation chemotherapy response (p < .001), and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell recuse (HDSCT, p = .002) correlated with survival. On multivariate analysis, pre-radiation chemotherapy response (p = .02) and GTR (p = .012) retained survival significance as compared to a trend for HDSCT (p = .072). Comparisons of focal RT (vs. CSI) and greater than or equal to 5400 cGy primary dose were nonsignificant. Following CR or PR, a statistical trend favored focal radiation (p = .089) over CSI. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy response prior to RT and GTR correlated with improved survival on multivariate analysis for ATRT M+ receiving RT. No benefit was observed for CSI compared to focal RT among all patients and following favorable chemotherapy response, inviting further study of focal RT for ATRT M+.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".