MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366382084 · doi:10.5922/1994-5280-2022-3-7

Transport permeability of borders

2022· article· en· W4366382084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S.A. Tarkhov

Bibliographic record

VenueRegional nye issledovaniya · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyChinaPermeability (electromagnetism)Physical geographyArchaeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The geographic differences in the transport permeability of the borders of 137 countries and 84 administrative-territorial units of the 1st level of the hierarchy of 6 countries are analyzed. It is measured by the indicator K by dividing the border perimeter (km) by the number of transport crossings (entrances) of the border. There are 10 groups of countries of the world according to the size of their territory. According to the peculiarities of the transport and geographical position in relation to the seas and land, all countries are divided into 13 types. The values of the total transport permeability index vary from 6.4 km (Switzerland) to 3391.3 km (Greenland). Its geographic differences in parts of the world are revealed: the countries of Europe on average have K = 52.6 km, the countries of Asia – 145.2 km, Africa – 177.8 km, America – 206.5 km, Australia and Oceania – 271.0 km. 6 subgroups of countries have been identified according to variations in K values: 1) fully open (the most permeable); 2) relatively open (permeable); 3) semi-open (relatively permeable); 4) semi-closed (medium permeable); 5) relatively closed (little permeable); 6) the most closed (almost impermeable). The values of transport permeability of the borders of 18 provinces of China, 20 states of the USA, 36 regions of Russia, 10 lands of Germany, 2 regions of Canada were calculated. The types of correlation between land and sea transport permeability of the borders are revealed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegional nye issledovaniyaSame topicCross-Border Cooperation and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207