Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article défend l’idée que les théories philosophiques élaborées en France autour de 1968 ont été reçues aux États-Unis, puis reconfigurées sous le nom de French Theory avant de servir à l’instauration d’une culture néolibérale. En faisant la revue de ces théories, on peut dire que Derrida, qui a été au plus profond de la métaphysique occidentale, aura délégitimé la Loi, toute loi, pour y substituer le principe d’une indécidabilité des normes, ce qui correspond parfaitement au sujet néolibéral ; que Deleuze, en s’opposant au capitalisme « patriarcal » aura préparé la place aux minorités identitaires du capitalisme contemporain ; que Foucault aura non seule-ment critiqué toutes les institutions au moment où le néolibéralisme attaquait l’État, mais aura même vu dans le néolibéralisme un espoir contre la société disciplinaire ; et que les réflexions de Butler vont dans le sens du déni du réel alliant la toute-puissance imaginaire et la croyance aveugle dans les technosciences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".