Bayesian instrumental variable estimation in linear measurement error models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this article, we study the problem of parameter estimation for measurement error models by combining the Bayes method with the instrumental variable approach, deriving the posterior distribution of parameters under different priors with known and unknown variance parameters, respectively, and calculating the Bayes estimator (BE) of the parameters under quadratic loss. However, it is difficult to obtain an explicit expression for BE because of the complex multiple integrals involved. Therefore, we adopt the linear Bayes method, which does not specify the form of the prior and avoids these complicated integral calculations, to obtain an expression for the linear Bayes estimator (LBE) for different priors. We prove that this LBE is superior to the two‐stage least squares estimator under the mean squared error matrix criterion. Numerical simulations show that our LBE is very close to the real parameter whether the variance parameters are known or unknown, and it gradually approaches BE as the sample size increases. Our results indicate that this instrumental variable approach is valid for measurement error models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it