Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regularization is an important technique for training deep neural networks. In this paper, we propose a novel shared-weight teacher-student strategy and a content-aware regularization (CAR) module. Based on a tiny, learnable, content-aware mask, CAR is randomly applied to some channels in the convolutional layers during training to be able to guide predictions in a shared-weight teacher-student strategy. CAR prevents motion estimation methods in unsupervised learning from co-adaptation. Extensive experiments on optical flow and scene flow estimation show that our method significantly improves on the performance of the original networks and surpasses other popular regularization methods. The method also surpasses all variants with similar architectures and the supervised PWC-Net on MPI-Sintel and on KITTI. Our method shows strong cross-dataset generalization, i.e., our method solely trained on MPI-Sintel outperforms a similarly trained supervised PWC-Net by 27.9% and 32.9% on KITTI, respectively. Our method uses fewer parameters and less computation, and has faster inference times than the original PWC-Net.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".