The Role and Challenges of Kejora in Rural Economic Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article discusses the role and challenges of the Southeast Johor Development Authority (KEJORA) particularly in rural economic development based on the KEJORA Regional Village Development Roadmap Master Plan. The plan has emphasised on the need to further strengthen the function of the establishment of KEJORA in maintaining the current planning aspects of the countryside in Southeast Johor and the surrounding areas beyond its influence. KEJORA has managed to develop the economic status and human capital development of the villagers in its area. Various projects under the implementation and management of KEJORA have been developed and benefited the villagers especially in agriculture, animal husbandry, tourism, agro-based industry, and resettlement of the population. KEJORA is also the only rural government agency that not only plans but also ensures that its implementation can provide overall benefits to the villagers. This is in line with the Rural Development Policy 2030 (DPLB). Looking at the strategies and projects that have been implemented, it is clear that KEJORA is more of a role as a coordinator to the rural community. This article also discusses various challenges that must be faced by KEJORA theoretically and technically, especially in overcoming problems related to rural economic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".