MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366492311 · doi:10.11159/iceptp23.194

Riverine Macro-litter: Plastic Pollution in Different Tributaries of the Ishëm River (Albania)

2023· article· en· W4366492311 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura Gjyli, Jerina Kolitari, Fundime Miri

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributaryPollutionEnvironmental scienceMacroLitterRiver pollutionHydrology (agriculture)GeologyGeographyGeotechnical engineeringEcologyComputer scienceEngineeringWaste managementBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According the Ocean Cleanup Ishëm River is the most polluted river in Europe with 733,000 kg of solid waste per year ending up in the Adriatic Sea.The Ishëm mouth is inside the MPAs Patok-Fushëkuqe-Ishëm with a surface of 5,001 ha under protection status: Managed Nature Reserve IUCN Category IV and Important Bird Area (AL006).Additionally Cape Rodon Nature Reserve is located within the Protected Landscape/Seascape Area of the Cape of Rodon-Lalzi Bay-Ishmi Forest with a surface area of 2,500 ha and classified under the IUCN Category V.In 2020, River-Cleanup.org has come to Albania to change the history of Ishëm River on plastic pollution together with Albanian people, especially the youth awareness, to protect the beauties of their natural resources.The riverine litter surveys were carried out on riverbanks at four study sites along Ishëm River, at Lana Stream, Tirana River, Limuth Stream and Gjola River.Study sites were randomly selected along the riverbank, parallel to the waterline, with a stretch of 100 m long.The mean macro-litter density of the Ishëm River became 0.992 items/m 2 and 1,269 items/100 m.The largest part of riverine litter items at the aggregated level were made of artificial polymer materials (82%).What we found mostly in the Ishem River about items there are G7 (drink bottles <=0.5l),G3 (shopping bags, incl.pieces), G30 (crisps packets/sweets wrappers) and G8 (drink bottles >0.5l).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207