HOPAV: Hybrid optimization‐oriented path planning for non‐connected and connected automated vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Over the past ten years, autonomous driving has garnered a great deal of interest from both the scientific community and business. Strong technological advancements have made automated driving more practical because human driving abilities seem limited in terms of driving experience, reaction time, and the effectiveness of real‐time decisions. The development of highly autonomous driving algorithms is inextricably tied to planning and changing a vehicle path that must be user‐acceptable, efficient, and collision‐free. Path planning for road vehicles is a difficult problem due to the high speed involved and the requirement to assure passenger safety. Here, a new path‐planning method is developed for both connected and disconnected automatic road vehicles on multilane highways. This paradigm states that the right phrases to describe the objectives of vehicle improvement, passenger comfort, prevention of vehicle‐to‐vehicle collisions and road deviations are included in the objective function. Hunger Games improved Archimedes optimization (HGE‐ARCO) is used to optimize the paths for achieving better‐planned outcomes. At the 100th penetration rate, the HGE‐ARCO scheme reached a top speed of about 99 km/h. The results shows unmistakably that the proposed HGE‐ARCO produces a time of 12.3021 s, which is less than other conventional methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".