MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366506619 · doi:10.11159/iceptp23.144

Nutrient Removal Efficiency of a Fibrous Polypropylene Biofilm Reactor in Pilot Scale

2023· article· en· W4366506619 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yee-Tian Leong, Meng-Hau Sung, David Chien-Liang Kuo

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolypropyleneBiofilmMaterials scienceNutrientWaste managementSCALE-UPEnvironmental scienceScale (ratio)Pulp and paper industryProcess engineeringChemical engineeringComposite materialChemistryEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dong Hai shopping district's discharge wastewater polluted the Dong Da stream.Therefore, The wastewater treatment plant was established to solve the problem, it decomposed the pollutant by biofilm that attaches to fibrous polypropylene(FB) in biological treatment process.Biofilm growth can directly affect the efficiency of wastewater treatment, but it was affected by the organic loading rate(OLR).This study referred to the wastewater treatment plant's biological process to set up the pilot scale.The purpose of setting up a pilot scale is to simulate the wastewater treatment plant's operation and observe biofilm's performance under different OLR.The average amount of COD removal in anaerobic reactor and aerobic was 129.2 mg/L and 310.6 mg/L when OLR was high, respectively, because the biomass was growing well.Biomass decreased when OLR was decreased, the average amount of COD removal in anaerobic reactor and aerobic was 15.2 mg/L and 13 mg/L, respectively.This indicated the removal efficiency of COD and the growth of biofilm were affected by OLR.Therefore, the relationship between the OLR and the growth of biofilm can be understood, and good wastewater treatment efficiency can be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207