Effect of Soil Type on Efficiency of Recycled Jute Fibre as Natural Reinforcing Material
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A developing nation like India is on a fast infrastructure buildup trajectory and we need to find suitability of different recyclable materials for construction and/or stabilization purpose.One such recyclable materials is jute which is produced in large quantity in the country annually.Primary objective of the study is to understand the suitability of jute fibre extracted from used gunny bags for strengthening of different soil types for various geotechnical applications.The extracted fibres are trimmed to different lengths of 5, 10 and 15mm and mixed in 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5% proportions based on dry mass of soil.Effect of the length and proportion of fibre in mixture with different type of soil is studied with regards to compaction characteristics and shear strength parameters.The study reveals that maximum dry density is attained for 10mm fibre mixed in 0.5%.The highest increment in shear strength is attained for 5mm fibre mixed in 1.5% proportion for sands and for clays, the undrained cohesion increases for all fibre lengths mixed in 0.25% proportion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".