MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366506749 · doi:10.11159/icsect23.147

Reaction Kinetic Studies of the Electrical Conductivity in Dissolution Experiments for the Identification of Alkali-Reactive Aggregate

2023· article· en· W4366506749 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hartmut Gyde, Schmidt-Döhl Frank, Püstow Anna

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsAlkali metalDissolutionAggregate (composite)Kinetic energyElectrical resistivity and conductivityIdentification (biology)ConductivityMaterials scienceChemical engineeringChemistryComposite materialElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The alkali-silica reaction (ASR) is still a significant damage process in concrete structures.During an ASR poorly crystalline aggregate reacts with alkalis to form an alkali-silica gel.The alkali-silica gel causes damage by expansion within the concrete structure through the absorption of water.Since stopping an ASR is often not possible, costly and, time-consuming, preventive measures are taken and the use of reactive aggregates is avoided.Various test methods for the identification of alkali reactive aggregates already exist worldwide.However, there is currently no test method that can evaluate an aggregate in the short term without prior analysis, as in the case of an incoming goods inspection.In the Institute of Materials, Physics and Chemistry of Buildings at Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH) a new fast test method to identify alkali-reactive aggregates is being worked on.The test method is an accelerated dissolution experiment with ground aggregate like chemical testing methods, such as ASTM C289.But in the new approach, the reactivity of the aggregate is derived from the change in several chemical parameters due to a dissolution process.The dissolution process of the aggregate takes place in hot alkaline solution with an excess of alkalis.During the experiment, the pH-value, the electrical conductivity, and the redox potential are recorded as a function of time.Conspicuous points, such as extreme points and stationary states of these functions are to be used to evaluate the reactivity of the aggregate.It is assumed that the alkali reactivity of the aggregates is essentially reflected in the chemical parameters and thus, in reverse, a specific evaluation of the functions could provide indications of the reactivity of the aggregate.In this paper we present results regarding reaction kinetics and show possibilities to use this new method as an indicator for the reactivity of an aggregate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207