MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366516882 · doi:10.58997/ejde.2023.01

Linear higher-order fractional differential and integral equations

2023· article· en· W4366516882 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Journal of Differential Equations · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsEquivalence (formal languages)Mathematical analysisNonlinear systemContraction principleOrder (exchange)Banach spaceDifferential equationFixed-point theoremIntegral equationFixed-point indexBoundary value problemApplied mathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the equivalences and the implications between linear (or homogeneous) nth order fractional differential equations (FDEs) and integral equations in the spaces L1(a,b) and C[a,b] when n≥ 2. We establish the equivalence in C[a,b] of the IVP of the nth order FDE subject to the initial condition u(i)(a)=ui for i in {0,1,...,n-1} when n≥2. The difficulty is that the known conditions for such equivalence for the first order FDEs are not sufficient for equivalence in the nth order FDEs with n≥2. In this article we provide additional conditions to ensure the equivalence for the nth order FDEs with n≥2. In particular, we obtain conditions under which solutions of the integral equations are solutions of the linear nth order FDEs. These results are keys for further studying the existence of solutions and nonnegative solutions to initial and boundary value problems of nonlinear nth order FDEs. This is done via the corresponding integral equations by topological methods such as the Banach contraction principle, fixed point index theory, and degree theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it