Development of fast analytical method for the detection and quantification of Moroccan picholine extra virgin olive oil adulteration using MIR spectroscopy and chemometrics tools
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the adulteration of Moroccan Picholine extra virgin olive oil with Arbequina virgin olive oil was monitored using the Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR) spectroscopy technique and chemometrics methodologies. To discriminate between olive oil that has been adulterated and unadulterated, principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized for qualitative analysis. We created the best calibration models for quantitative analysis using principal component regression (PCR) and partial least-squares regression (PLS). The first three principal components account for 95% of the overall variability, according to PCA analysis. PCA allows for the classification of the dataset into two groups: adulterated and unadulterated Moroccan Picholine olive oil. The application of the PLS and PCR calibration models for the quantification of adulteration demonstrates high-performance capabilities, as indicated by high values of correlation coefficients R2 greater than 0.999 and 0.995 and lower values of root mean square error (RMSE) less than 0.767 and 2.16 using PLS and PCR, respectively. According to our results, FT-MIR spectroscopy combined with chemometrics approaches can be used successfully as a simple, quick, and non-destructive method for the quantification and discrimination of adulterated olive oil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".