Spatial-extent inference for testing variance components in reliability and heritability studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Clusterwise inference is a popular approach in neuroimaging to increase sensitivity, but most existing methods are currently restricted to the General Linear Model (GLM) for testing mean parameters. Statistical methods for testing variance components , which are critical in neuroimaging studies that involve estimation of narrow-sense heritability or test-retest reliability, are underdeveloped due to methodological and computational challenges, which would potentially lead to low power. We propose a fast and powerful test for variance components called CLEAN-V ( CLEAN for testing V ariance components). CLEAN-V models the global spatial dependence structure of imaging data and computes a locally powerful variance component test statistic by data-adaptively pooling neighborhood information. Correction for multiple comparisons is achieved by permutations to control family-wise error rate (FWER). Through analysis of task-fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project across five tasks and comprehensive data-driven simulations, we show that CLEAN-V outperforms existing methods in detecting test-retest reliability and narrow-sense heritability with significantly improved power, with the detected areas aligning with activation maps. The computational efficiency of CLEAN-V also speaks of its practical utility, and it is available as an R package.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.178 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".