Undersampled Diffusion-Weighted 129Xe MRI Morphometry of Airspace Enlargement: Feasibility in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-b diffusion-weighted hyperpolarized gas MRI measures pulmonary airspace enlargement using apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and mean linear intercepts (Lm). Rapid single-breath acquisitions may facilitate clinical translation, and, hence, we aimed to develop single-breath three-dimensional multi-b diffusion-weighted 129Xe MRI using k-space undersampling. We evaluated multi-b (0, 12, 20, 30 s/cm2) diffusion-weighted 129Xe ADC/morphometry estimates using a fully sampled and retrospectively undersampled k-space with two acceleration-factors (AF = 2 and 3) in never-smokers and ex-smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or alpha-one anti-trypsin deficiency (AATD). For the three sampling cases, mean ADC/Lm values were not significantly different (all p > 0.5); ADC/Lm values were significantly different for the COPD subgroup (0.08 cm2s−1/580 µm, AF = 3; all p < 0.001) as compared to never-smokers (0.05 cm2s−1/300 µm, AF = 3). For never-smokers, mean differences of 7%/7% and 10%/7% were observed between fully sampled and retrospectively undersampled (AF = 2/AF = 3) ADC and Lm values, respectively. For the COPD subgroup, mean differences of 3%/4% and 11%/10% were observed between fully sampled and retrospectively undersampled (AF = 2/AF = 3) ADC and Lm, respectively. There was no relationship between acceleration factor with ADC or Lm (p = 0.9); voxel-wise ADC/Lm measured using AF = 2 and AF = 3 were significantly and strongly related to fully-sampled values (all p < 0.0001). Multi-b diffusion-weighted 129Xe MRI is feasible using two different acceleration methods to measure pulmonary airspace enlargement using Lm and ADC in COPD participants and never-smokers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".