MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4366597107 · doi:10.3390/curroncol30040329

The Incidence and Prevalence of Primary Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumours in Canada (2010–2017), and the Survival of Patients Diagnosed with CNS Tumours (2008–2017)

2023· article· en· W4366597107 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Emily Walker, Yiling Zhou, Yifan Wu, Jiaqi Liu, Seth Climans, Faith G. Davis, Yan Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
FundersBrain Tumour Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineHistologyIncidence (geometry)MalignancyGlioblastomaCancer registryMeningiomaCancerPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary central nervous system (CNS) tumours are heterogeneous, with different treatment pathways and prognoses depending on their histological and molecular classification. Due to their anatomical location, all CNS tumours, regardless of malignancy, can be debilitating. We used vital statistics linked to Canadian Cancer Registry data to estimate the age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR), Kaplan-Meier survival rates (SR), and limited-duration prevalence proportions (PP) of 25 histology-specific CNS tumour groups that were classified based on site and histology. During 2010-2017, 45,115 patients were diagnosed with 47,085 primary CNS tumours, of which 19.0% were unclassified. The average annual ASIR was 21.48/100,000 person-years and did not vary by sex. The ASIR increased with age, particularly for meningioma, unclassified tumours, and glioblastoma. The eight-year PP was 102.1/100,000 persons (index date 1 January 2018). The most common histology was meningioma (ASIR: 5.19; PP: 31.6). The overall five-year SR among 51,310 patients diagnosed during 2008-2017 was 57.2% (95% CI: 56.8-57.7%). SRs varied by tumour behaviour, histology, and patient age, with the lowest SR among glioblastoma patients (5-year SRs ranged from 1.3-25.7%). For non-malignant tumours, the 5-year SRs ranged from 37.4-100%. We provide the most up-to-date histology-specific surveillance estimates for primary CNS tumours in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→