MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366602286 · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20344

Recipients of 2022 CSSA Editor's Citation for Excellence Named

2023· editorial· en· W4366602286 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Genome · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceBiologyCitationComputational biologyLibrary scienceComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The editorial board of The Plant Genome is pleased to announce the recipients of the 2022 Editor's Citation for Excellence. These awards recognize the outstanding professional commitment and dedication of volunteer reviewers and/or editors who, through their excellent insights and comments, have helped maintain the high standard and quality of papers published in the journal. Recipients were nominated based on their thorough, competent, and timely reviews or editing of manuscripts. Each will receive a certificate of appreciation, an ASA-CSSA-SSSA gift certificate, and recognition in CSA News. Dr. François Belzile was trained as a plant molecular geneticist and initially worked on DNA repair and recombination genes in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Over the last 20 years, Dr. Belzile's lab at the Université Laval, Canada, has been interested in using genomics to develop novel approaches in plant breeding, mainly in soybean and barley. Dr. Belzile aims to act as a bridge and a facilitator between the lab-based genomic sciences and their numerous applications in the development of new and improved crop varieties. His lab works closely with industry partners to jointly develop and implement genomics-informed breeding programs. Dr. Rupesh Deshmukh is currently working as Associate Professor at the Central University of Haryana, India. He obtained his PhD degree in Agriculture Biotechnology from SRTMU, Nanded, India. His group is working on improving rice and tomato crops through integrated genomic approaches. Crop improvement for nutritive food and sustainable agriculture are two major areas of his research. His name is featured in a list of the World's Top 2% of highly cited researchers published by Stanford University. He received several highly competitive awards including Ramalingaswami Re-entry Fellowship and NASI-Scopus Young Scientist Award. He is recognized as a Fellow of the ISGPB and ARRW scientific societies. Dr. Humira Sonah earned her master's degree in Agriculture Biotechnology from Indira Gandhi Agriculture University, Raipur, India. She did her Doctorate from Banasthali University while working at the National Institute on Plant Biotechnology. Soon after her Ph.D., she joined Laval University, Canada, as a Postdoctoral Researcher where she was involved to explore the genotyping-by-sequencing method useful to accelerate crop improvement followed by Genome-wide association studies. She did another postdoctoral fellowship at Missouri University, USA. She rejoined Laval University and worked as a Visiting Professor. Considering her remarkable achievements in Plant Biology, the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India awarded her Ramalingaswami Fellowship which is one of the most prestigious awards aiming to attract high-quality Indian nationals working abroad. Presently, Dr. Sonah is Ramalingaswami Fellow at National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute and her group is working to develop food-grade soybean. She was featured in 75 under 50, Scientist shaping today's India-2022 published by Vigyan Prasar, Government of India on National Science Day, and also featured in the list of world's top 2% researchers published by Stanford University (2022). Not pictured: Dr. Philipp Bayer, The University of Western Australia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0240.007
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0130.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2120.186

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant GenomeSame topicAcademic Publishing and Open AccessFrench-language works237,207